Skip to Content

4 Myths about Mobile for Destinations

Buffer

As destination marketers…DMOs, CVBs, VCBs, etc…there is perhaps no innovation with more potential than mobile. However, as more DMOs adopt a mobile strategy, myths about mobile seem to gain momentum.

As destination marketers...DMOs, CVBs, VCBs, etc...there is perhaps no innovation with more potential than mobile.  The sheer number of devices (especially smart phones), geo-awareness (GPS) and mobility (uh, mobile) is an unique opportunity for tourism marketing organizations.

However, as more DMOs adopt a mobile strategy, myths about mobile seem to gain momentum.

Let's put a stop to some of the more ridiculous ones we have heard recently.  Whether it is an iPhone app, mobile website or texting campaign, don't let these 4 myths derail your mobile marketing strategy.

4 Myths about Mobile Marketing for Destinations

We have a mobile website, so we have a mobile strategy.

A classic variation of this myth also takes the form of 'just put the same content from our website on the mobile app/website/whatever.'

Quite a few 'traditional' interactive developers have perpetuated this myth in the last year.  Basically, the interactive developer was horrified at the idea of loosing their grip on anything and everything related to digital, so they quickly threw together a plan to make any website into a mobile version overnight.

Plus, it's free to current clients!

For the client, who let's face it, doesn't really understand the different between an app and an api, and just wants to check the mobile box to look good in front of the board, it is the ideal solution.

So, desperation and futility win out and the destination ends up with a mobile version of their website.

A solution that offers relatively little value for the consumer.  For most destinations, a website is a directory...fine for the web...but not right, and certainly not relevant, for mobile.

Does this mean you should not pursue a mobile website as part of your mobile strategy?  No, of course not.  However, be wary of firms who offer a quick fix.

Apps are too expensive, we don't spend that much on our website.

'We spend X amount on our website and get 100k visitors, so why should I spend double on mobile and only receive 25k visitors.'

A common misconception.

First, take a look at your website stats.  From experience, I would assume at least half of your visitors are spending somewhere between 10-20 seconds on your website.  With that little nugget of knowledge, let's re-evaluate our perspective on the value of a visitor.

Mobile is an investment in the future effectiveness of your marketing strategy.

Secondly, tourism iPhone apps can be cost-effective.  Especially if you find the right partner.  Which means, don't sign with the first developer who walks in your door.  Determine your goals, research the vendors and develop a strategy.

We know of one vendor who is providing a very cost-effective model for any DMO...but that is best saved for another post.

The visitor is already here, we don't need a mobile solution.

Let us not repeat mistakes of the past.  With every destination fighting to remain relevant in the mind of the consumer, mobile is a critical positioning tool.  The web is fragmented and to be honest, no traveler needs to visit a CVB or DMO website to plan a successful trip.

However, destinations do have an opportunity to capture some market share in terms of mobile.  Especially if the application or mobile site is helpful and useful to the consumer.

Plus, owning the mobile space within your destination allows you to provide additional services to your members, while capturing significant revenue from advertisers who want to reach the tourist in your town.

Yes, the visitor is already in market and what better time to establish the DMO as the local expert.

Everyone uses apps, texting, mobile browsers...and everyone has a smartphone.

Recent data from comScore shows that about 35% of consumers utilize some type of mobile media...app or via a mobile browser.  Which means 65% of consumers don't care how fantastic your app is...they are not downloading it.

Just one stat, but a good example of why you, as the tourism marketer, should not paint all of your mobile consumers with the same brush.  Some use apps, some text and others just want a phone.

It would be fantastic if everyone owned an iPhone and used apps, but with so much competition in terms of hardware, operating systems and media, a singular mobile future is a long way off.

Additionally, there will always be a group of consumers who just want a phone, nothing more.

Impossible you say?

Take the example of cable television...everyone has it right?  Not really.  Approximately 40% of Americans do not have cable / satellite television in the home.  And that number has remained steady for years.

When developing your destination's mobile strategy, take the crawl, walk, run approach.  Start small, but manageable and build from there, ensuring a proper solution for each segment of your mobile audience.

avatar

Troy Thompson

Troy Thompson is a respected consultant, speaker and thought-leader in the tourism industry. Principal at the Travel 2.0 Consulting Group and Founder of mark, Troy provides destinations, DMOs and CVBs with answers to difficult digital marketing questions.

More Articles - Twitter - Google+

  • http://buhlerworks.com/wordpress JEBworks

    Sound advice. Troy. As with so many other new initiatives, it should start with a strategy and not the tactical knee jerk response to the latest must have thing everyone talks about. But, hey everyone is so busy with putting out the fire of the day it seems at the expense of some essential strategic thinking.

    One comment: You mention that no traveler needs to visit a CVB/DMO site to pla a successful trip. That's actually a sad state of affairs in my opinion,as it should be one of the essential sites to visit, rather than some new start-up built by two frustrated travelers from the Valley trying to solve complex problems involved with that process.

  • http://www.travel2dot0.com/ Troy Thompson

    Thanks Joe, always a solid comment / thought.

    As for the need to visit a CVB / DMO site, I agree, it is a sad state of affairs and should be one of the essential sites to visit. But, alas, it simply is not.

    At the same time, I also think we have reached a saturation point for new start-ups trying to solve the travel planning problem. Too many for the consumer to make an educated decision on where to start the trip planning process...let alone actually planning the trip.

    Good thoughts, thanks Joe!

    - Troy

  • http://buhlerworks.com/wordpress JEBworks

    My thoughts exactly, on both points. In my opinion the two should start working together more, along the lines of the deal between Visit Britain and TravelMuse which vastly improves the data presentation of the former on the latter site. That type of cooperation is only the start and should go deeper and wider. Is that an opportunity you might want to discuss how to explore together?

  • http://www.travel2dot0.com/ Troy Thompson

    Hey Joe, love the thought and the example. Completely agree, deeper partnerships from both sides will provide benefits for all....relevancy for the DMO, credibility for the start-up.

    Yeah, let's chat about that opportunity. Email or DM me.

    - Troy

  • http://buhlerworks.com/wordpress JEBworks

    and last but by no means least a win for the consumer!
    Will email you directly.

  • Kathy

    Our local CVB just went "mobile." If you have examples of any CVBs that have great mobile sites, please let me know. Would like to see them and compare. Thanks!

  • http://www.travel2dot0.com/ Troy Thompson

    Good mobile site = KC. Poor = Nashville.

    Thanks for the comment Kathy.

    I like the Kansas City CVA mobile site (http://m.visitkc.com) currently. Good, not great, but a solid start. I love fact that the first items shown are relevant to the visitor who is physically in the destination...Events and Special Deals.

    However, the resulting event / deal lists are still a bit long for me.

    The standard CVB filler (Places to Stay) is present, but pushed to the background. Logically, if you are already in KC, I would certainly hope you have a place to stay.

    As for a poor example, Nashville is a good one...or bad one.

    Nothing against the fine folks from Nashville, but the mobile site (http://www.visitmusiccity.mobi/) is just a huge...and I mean huge...directory listing. Not very helpful to the visitor.

    Instant improvement tip, use the intro screen to ask the visitor where they are...downtown, near the state capitol, etc...then present relevant information...

    ...instead of everything.

    Kathy, love to know your local CVB and take a look myself.

    Again, thanks for the comment.

    - Troy

Strategic Tourism Consulting


Travel 2.0 Consulting Group is the premier strategic-planning consulting firm with an exclusive focus on tourism / travel destinations and tourism-centric advertising agencies. [+]

From the Travel 2.0 Blog

Creating A Dream, Not Selling Reality

Creating A Dream, Not Selling Reality

Tourism promotion is not about listing all of the possible options for the virgin visitor, but rathe[+]

@travel2dot0 [ ]